[xorg-server-1.5] build fails against mesa GIT master
dbn.lists at gmail.com
Thu May 29 00:54:18 PDT 2008
On Wed, May 28, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Steven J Newbury
<steve at snewbury.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-05-28 at 14:10 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> On 21:06 Wed 28 May , Tobias Jakobi wrote:
>> > I'm trying not to build anything outside the Gentoo portage environment,
>> > especially something important like xorg-server.
>> > Also I don't want to fiddle around too much with the current GIT ebuild.
>> I updated all the ebuilds in the x11 overlay for the MPX merge. If they
>> don't work for you, please let me know. I'm using them now.
> Hi Donnie,
> on a related subject I have just attached a proposed patch to the mesa
> ebuild to http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204755
> I'd appreciate your comments.
I wouldn't suggest using the --enable-32/64-bit switches for mesa.
They were just implemented as a quick method to get the 32/64 bit
flags right for someone that's not that familiar with autoconf.
However, the right way to do this (especially for a controlled build
environment like an ebuild or an rpm) is to use --host and --build
like any other autotooled package. The arch-specific settings in
configure follow the $host* settings. The 32/64-bit switches just
kludge things to try to work that way, too, but it's not as foolproof
as just telling configure what arch you're building for.
More information about the xorg