RFC: Xv field order

Thomas Hilber xorg at toh.cx
Tue Jun 23 09:16:43 PDT 2009


On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 09:56:20PM +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> My assumption (please correct if wrong):
> - it requires interlaced display mode (i830+: practically completed).

sorry, but opposite to i810 and i9xx the i830 is not capable of doing
any interlaced video output.

> - the video windows must not be scaled vertically.

this restriction applies for i810 but is no longer true for i9xx graphics

> - sync events for TFF and BFF are signaled by interrupts. For
>   progressive video (with interlaced display mode, of course) we can

not necessarily by driver interrupts. In [1] (intel portion of
vga-sync-fields patch) I simply peek some registers (DOVSTA and PIPEA_DSL)
directly within the Xserver to determine the actual line + field position
of CRT controller at any time.

In [2] (radeon portion of the patch) I do the same with radeon graphics.
A small DRM-driver patch there is only needed to dynamically alter video
output timing.

You are right: for i810 some field related overlay regs must be 
reprogrammed during vertical retrace interrupts.
This is no longer true for i9xx architecture. 2 weaved fields are
processed there with no driver (interrupt) intervention.

- Thomas

[1] http://www.easy-vdr.de/git?p=frc.git/.git;a=blob;f=patches/xv-intel.patch;h=b54655a6d6473f55b49fac759f4afc77c101d69f;hb=20810204a85917449096a5fbba65d996c0a1ac2c

[2] http://www.easy-vdr.de/git?p=frc.git/.git;a=blob;f=patches/xv-radeon.patch;h=8c6ee3f199f70364c91057c634dfbf864c3db656;hb=20810204a85917449096a5fbba65d996c0a1ac2c



More information about the xorg mailing list