[PATCH] Bug in Xextproto

[Bill Crawford]

On Saturday 28 March 2009 17:42:54 Simon Thum wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
...
> > Can't we work something out with Qt folks?
>
> Good idea, but I think the above sounds like adopting a
> what-breaks-gets-fixed policy is the most realistic option. Adam
> probably has to say something enlightening.

Weeeeell ... ISTR X existed before Qt ;o) so probably it should be they who 
don't decide to conflict. But I'm just one man, one opinion ...

The least we could do in most of those cases is probably to get u?int32_t in use 
where we expecting a particular size.