Still a few doubts about Zaphod and Radeon

[Dave Airlie]

On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Lawrence Statton <lawrence at cluon.com> wrote:
> I feel that I have arrived at a fortuitous time in that Zaphod is
> (apparently) back
>
> I'm a greybeard and I *like* each of my monitors to have it's own X screen
> (:0.0, :0.1 and :0.2) for reasons that probably make sense to nobody but me.
>
> I have a IBM ThinkCentre with Intel 915 graphics on the motherboard and a
> Radeon 9000 series dual VGA PCI card.  The motherboard video is driving a
> 22" HP LCD and the Radeon is driving a pair of HP 17" 4:3 LCDs.
>
> After a side trip into "my window manager sucks" land, and me blaming the
> good folks over at GDM for compiz (and more importantly my own) lossage, I
> now have all three displays with distinct video in a "usable but not quite
> perfect" configuration.
>
> I'm up to two X screens, :0.0 ( the IGP video)  and the radeon card driving
> a virtual 2560x1024 frame buffer driving the other two monitors.
>
> I saw Alex Deuchar's recent response on the list to Samud and I immediately
> tried to duplicate (as close as possible) their results, but without luck.
>
> Alex writes:  "You need to add Screen 0 and Screen 1 to your device
> sections"
>
> Is this correct?  When I tried to do this, I got a coredump

Sorry to hijack this thread, someone has messed with list addresses.

Dave.