mixed OpenGL vendor drivers
Matt Turner
mattst88 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 16 16:21:11 PST 2010
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Kai-Uwe Behrmann <ku.b at gmx.de> wrote:
> ATI and Nvidia ship separate version of libGL.so, for Linux and probably for
> other operating systems. Now I want to make a Live media with
> "out of the box" fantastic OpenGL support for a wide range of
> graphic cards.
>
> Is the replacement by vendors of libGL something dictated by the
> architecture of Xorg or the OpenGL spec? What are good solutions to switch
> the library on the fly?
>
> (That written, I admire the efforts to bring open sourced GL drivers on the
> table. But artists need for work horse graphics really fast drivers.
> Otherwise coe in danger to simply switch the platform.)
Can you legally redistribute ATI/Nvidia's binary drivers?
Back in the Xgl days, someone made a LiveCD to show off the spinning
cube, and in order to make this work distributed the drivers on the
CD. I think they realized (or were told?) that they weren't really
supposed to do that and stopped making the CD.
It's pretty pedantic, but.
Matt
More information about the xorg
mailing list