[Bug 34004] New Account Request

Luc Verhaegen libv at skynet.be
Wed Feb 9 23:19:09 PST 2011


On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:56:04AM +0100, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote:
> Luc Verhaegen <libv at skynet.be> writes:
> 
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:02:58PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:43:07PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
> >> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:36:32AM -0800, bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org wrote:
> >> > > --- Comment #4 from Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> 2011-02-09 06:36:31 PST ---
> >> > > done
> >> > 
> >> > Root access restored, i presume?
> >> 
> >> Yes.  Tollef's opinion was that quitting was a copout and that I should
> >> instead go fix some sitewranglers bugs instead.
> >
> > Until the next time you're drunk, i'm sure.
> 
> It sounds like you are saying that Daniel should be banned from further
> participation in xorg for life.

There is a huge difference between participation and being fully 
reinstated into a position that has been abused before.

> (If you do choose to make a case, take the time to make sure your
> arguments are well thought out before posting.  Remember, your arguments
> will have to sound convincing to a large number of people on this list,
> or you may as well not bother.)

All arguments were made, extensively, before.

Except maybe for one:

The claimed reason for reinstating daniels now is that apparently nobody 
else wants to take on an admin role at fd.o. I would like to know which 
known dependable community members were approached for such roles before 
this decision here was taken.

Luc Verhaegen.



More information about the xorg mailing list