[Bug 34004] New Account Request

[Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen]

Luc Verhaegen <libv at skynet.be> writes:

> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:56:04AM +0100, Eirik Byrkjeflot Anonsen wrote:
>> Luc Verhaegen <libv at skynet.be> writes:
>> 
>> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:02:58PM +0000, Daniel Stone wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 03:43:07PM +0100, Luc Verhaegen wrote:
>> >> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2011 at 06:36:32AM -0800, bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org wrote:
>> >> > > --- Comment #4 from Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> 2011-02-09 06:36:31 PST ---
>> >> > > done
>> >> > 
>> >> > Root access restored, i presume?
>> >> 
>> >> Yes.  Tollef's opinion was that quitting was a copout and that I should
>> >> instead go fix some sitewranglers bugs instead.
>> >
>> > Until the next time you're drunk, i'm sure.
>> 
>> It sounds like you are saying that Daniel should be banned from further
>> participation in xorg for life.
>
> There is a huge difference between participation and being fully 
> reinstated into a position that has been abused before.

Then maybe you should have been more careful to word your complaint in a
form that clearly said exactly what you were complaining about, as well
as what you think should be done about it.  Don't leave it to the reader
to guess.

>> (If you do choose to make a case, take the time to make sure your
>> arguments are well thought out before posting.  Remember, your arguments
>> will have to sound convincing to a large number of people on this list,
>> or you may as well not bother.)
>
> All arguments were made, extensively, before.

Fine.  If you think the arguments are well-known, then there is no need
to repeat them.  But you still have to clearly state what action you
expect "someone" to take.  Otherwise, you will most likely just be
ignored.

eirik