[Xcb] [ANNOUNCE] xcb-util 0.3.8
Knut_Petersen at t-online.de
Tue May 24 13:46:06 PDT 2011
> It looks like the intention was to merge them all into one file, but there are still missing symbols from the old -aux, -atom, -event that are not in the new lib (some of which were mentioned in the ChangeLog, others which weren't)
> So, do I need to ship two versions of xcb-util to customers, or is this going to be reversed to fix binary compatibility?
An outdated ModularDevelopersGuide is a good way to put potential
testers off, but breaking compatibility is an even better way to reduce
the number of people actually testing the prerelease tree.
More information about the xorg