Fw: X server does not have an option to specify which address to listen on for TCP connections

[Dave Howorth]

On Mon, 11 May 2020 14:38:48 +0000
ornx <ornx at protonmail.com> wrote:

> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
> On Monday, May 11, 2020 8:18 AM, Attila Kinali <attila at kinali.ch>
> wrote:
>   
> > On Mon, 11 May 2020 01:41:11 +0000
> > ornx ornx at protonmail.com wrote:
> >    
> > > why?    
> >
> > Probably because it has never come up? X was intended to be used
> > on desktops, which, usually, had only a single network interface.
> > In case restrictions were needed, xauth/xhost provided the means
> > to limit access. These days TCP is even disabled on most distros
> > by default, for security reasons.
> >
> > Attila Kinali    
>   
> >X was intended to be used on desktops    
> is this really true? my understanding is that X has always had a
> networked client/server model
> 
> my use case is that i need X to use TCP so that i can intercept its
> traffic with wireshark for debugging purposes, but i only need this
> server accessible on the loopback interface and specifically do not
> want it listening on any other interfaces for basic security reasons
> of not giving programs any network resources that they do not
> strictly need. using xauth/xhost seems insufficient for this purpose,
> because i already know that i do not want any external traffic to be
> able to access the server, why do i need to decide this at the
> application level instead of specifying it at the network level? what
> if there is a bug in the X authentication mechanism? the workaround
> for this is also rather inconvenient and requires specialized
> knowledge, to prevent external network traffic from reaching X now
> involves writing firewall rules instead of merely setting a flag
> limiting the interfaces that X is listening on. it is also at odds
> with normal networking application behavior, i have actually never
> encountered a program before that listened on a port but did not
> allow to specify the listening interface
> 
> is the reason why this behavior has not been implemented in Xorg
> simply because nobody has thought to add it, or is there a specific
> reason that it was left out? if someone provided a patch implementing
> this behavior, would it have a chance of being merged?  

I think you can do what you want using socat as described at
https://superuser.com/questions/484671/can-i-monitor-a-local-unix-domain-socket-like-tcpdump

The socket might be /tmp/.X11-unix/X0 for example.