21 Oct
2021
21 Oct
'21
11:06 a.m.
Op 21-10-2021 om 12:38 schreef Christian König:
Am 21.10.21 um 12:35 schrieb Maarten Lankhorst:
From: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com
Simplifying the code a bit.
Signed-off-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com [mlankhorst: Handle timeout = 0 correctly, use new i915_request_wait_timeout.] Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
LGTM, do you want to push it or should I pick it up into drm-misc-next?
I think it can be applied to drm-intel-gt-next, after a backmerge. It needs patch 1 too, which fixes
i915_request_wait semantics when used in dma-fence. It exports a dma-fence compatible i915_request_wait_timeout function, used in this patch.