On 10/02/2022 21:47, John.C.Harrison@Intel.com wrote:
From: John Harrison John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
It is possible for reset notifications to arrive for a context that is in the process of being banned. So don't flag these as an error, just report it as informational (because it is still useful to know that resets are happening even if they are being ignored).
Is the "invalid" in the log message correct then or it should be something slightly different? Delayed? Ignored? "Ignoring .. for banned.." ?
Regards,
Tvrtko
Signed-off-by: John Harrison John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c index b3a429a92c0d..3a4a87d1c89c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c @@ -4022,10 +4022,10 @@ static void guc_handle_context_reset(struct intel_guc *guc, capture_error_state(guc, ce); guc_context_replay(ce); } else {
drm_err(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,"Invalid GuC engine reset notificaion for 0x%04X on %s: banned = %d, blocked = %d",ce->guc_id.id, ce->engine->name, intel_context_is_banned(ce),context_blocked(ce));
drm_info(&guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm,"Invalid GuC engine reset notification for 0x%04X on %s: banned = %d, blocked = %d",ce->guc_id.id, ce->engine->name, intel_context_is_banned(ce),context_blocked(ce));