26 Mar
2021
26 Mar
'21
10:47 p.m.
26.03.2021 22:10, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
On 3/26/21 8:31 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
26.03.2021 17:54, Mikko Perttunen пишет:
Lockdep doesn't seem to be liking dev_name() for the name, and I think allocating a string for this purpose seems a bit overkill, so I'll keep the lock name as is if there are no objections.
What does "liking" mean?
kernel/locking/lockdep.c:894 (on my local tree):
WARN_ON_ONCE(class->name != lock->name && lock->key != &__lockdep_no_validate__);
Alright, I see now that lockdep requires to use the same name.