On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 05:31:30PM -0500, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jason Ekstrand jason@jlekstrand.net
Maybe spend a few words on explaining why in these two selftest patches instead of letting me guess :-) -Daniel
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c index 76029d7143f6c..76dd5cfe11b3c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/selftests/i915_gem_context.c @@ -813,16 +813,12 @@ static int igt_shared_ctx_exec(void *arg) struct i915_gem_context *ctx; struct intel_context *ce;
ctx = kernel_context(i915, NULL);
ctx = kernel_context(i915, ctx_vm(parent)); if (IS_ERR(ctx)) { err = PTR_ERR(ctx); goto out_test; }
mutex_lock(&ctx->mutex);__assign_ppgtt(ctx, ctx_vm(parent));mutex_unlock(&ctx->mutex);ce = i915_gem_context_get_engine(ctx, engine->legacy_idx); GEM_BUG_ON(IS_ERR(ce));-- 2.31.1
Intel-gfx mailing list Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx