On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 09:51:06AM +0100, Michael Riesch wrote:
From: Alex Bee knaerzche@gmail.com
The Bifrost GPU in Rockchip RK356x SoCs has a core and a bus clock. Reflect this in the SoC specific part of the binding.
Signed-off-by: Alex Bee knaerzche@gmail.com [move the changes to the SoC section] Signed-off-by: Michael Riesch michael.riesch@wolfvision.net
.../devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml index 63a08f3f321d..21409c8d3813 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/arm,mali-bifrost.yaml @@ -159,6 +159,21 @@ allOf: power-domains: maxItems: 1 sram-supply: false
- if:
properties:compatible:contains:const: rockchip,rk3568-mali- then:
properties:clocks:minItems: 2clock-names:items:- const: core- const: bus
Please don't invent new names. We already have 'gpu' and 'bus' defined. 'core' and 'gpu' sound like the same thing to me, and the h/w doesn't have different clocks from vendor to vendor.
Rob