Hi Lyude: I appreciate your feedback and I misplaced the commit message to the title, I have modified it and resend the patch. I made my linux development tree a mess, so I sent a brandly new one and cc you. Thanks again for your help: )
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 1:18 PM Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com wrote:
This is a very long patch name, it should probably be shorter and the details in the patch title moved into the actual commit description instead. Also a couple of things aren't formatted correctly:
- Cc tag for stable is missing, see https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
- Fixes tag isn't formatted properly
I generally recommend using `dim fixes` from https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html in order to get the correct stable kernel CC tag and Fixes: tag (you can drop any of the Ccs it gives you beyond the one to stable at vger dot kernel dot org.
Also, if you could try to Cc: me on the next version - will help me respond faster :).
On Mon, 2021-11-15 at 23:07 -0800, Yizhuo Zhai wrote:
Fixes:01326050391ce("drm/nouveau/core/object: allow arguments to be passed to map function") Signed-off-by: Yizhuo Zhai yzhai003@ucr.edu
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/ioctl.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/ioctl.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/ioctl.c index 735cb6816f10..4264d9d79783 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/ioctl.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/core/ioctl.c @@ -266,6 +266,8 @@ nvkm_ioctl_map(struct nvkm_client *client, ret = nvkm_object_map(object, data, size, &type, &args->v0.handle, &args->v0.length);
if (ret)return ret; if (type == NVKM_OBJECT_MAP_IO) args->v0.type = NVIF_IOCTL_MAP_V0_IO; else-- Cheers, Lyude Paul (she/her) Software Engineer at Red Hat
-- Kind Regards,
Yizhuo Zhai
Computer Science, Graduate Student University of California, Riverside