On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 01:23:50 +0100, David Reveman wrote:
> > hm. thinko on my end. kept reading != as ==. sorry.
Gee, I can't imagine why:
if (status != CAIRO_INT_STATUS_UNSUPPORTED) {
Double negatives aren't the easiest things to parse correctly in
English. It might be useful to rework this with a more intelligible
idiom.
-Carl