[Fwd: Re: [Clipart] Nazi flag]

[Daniel Carrera]

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Clipart] Nazi flag
Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2005 14:58:29 +0100
From: Daniel Carrera <dcarrera at digitaldistribution.com>
To: Patricia FIDI <fidipat at levillage-afrique.com>
References: <BAY105-F42A190E5D42DA45B4C77278DC40 at phx.gbl> 
<42F19D80.90103 at wixsonit.com>	<42F1B82B.9060708 at apsro.com> 
<42F1EEF8.3020307 at digitaldistribution.com> 
<1123161348.7794.46.camel at wildsrc.fluendo.lan> 
<42F21DF3.4010808 at levillage-afrique.com>

Patricia FIDI wrote:
> Porn sites with agreeing adults ask users if they are adult or
> child before to enter.
> -----------------------------------
> 
> We won't see the the end of this discussion, you should reserve
> a part of OCAL for images wich can be a problem for religious
> persons (they have the right to be not hurt too by their belief),
> for chilren users...

I agree. We can have separate sections for potentially hurtful or
offensive images. Like an "adult" section for porn.


> You will leave choice to users !

As long as the choice is clearly labeled (like your example with porn
sites) I'm cool with that. Kevin's argument was mostly about
accidentally downloading something you didn't expect.


> *BUT* all porn child images have to be delete.
> Why ? Because a child doesn't accept to be hurt in this way
> by an adult. So you won't find anywhere on earth a law which
> allow porn child.

/daniel nods

Cheers,
Daniel.
-- 
      /\/`) Leave your mark at OpenOffice.org
     /\/_/
    /\/_/   OOoAuthors:     http://oooauthors.org
    \/_/    Knowledge Base: http://mindmeld.cybersite.com.au/
    /


-- 
      /\/`) Leave your mark at OpenOffice.org
     /\/_/
    /\/_/   OOoAuthors:     http://oooauthors.org
    \/_/    Knowledge Base: http://mindmeld.cybersite.com.au/
    /