[Clipart] URGENT: http://www.openclipart.org/detail/48463

[chovynz]

Can we have some Clarity on how the NSFW tags work?
In the old CCHost OCAL there was a NSFW checkbox on upload AND you could add
tags later. The end result was that a checkbox was activated (binary 1/0)
AND a tag could be there as well.

How does the new OCAL NSFW tagging work with Aiki?

I'd like to see the display nsfw toggle in the authors "preferences" or
perhaps in the manage clipart page.

Ciao
Chovynz


On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:49 PM, chovynz <chovynz at gmail.com> wrote:

> That too.
> Do you need model releases for people? if so that's ... pretty restrictive!
> How would we provide for that on OCAL? A secondary upload area for "people"
> clipart, so that anyone can see the release form, and be sure that the image
> they use IS PD? How far does it extend?
> How does this apply to vectorised people already on the Database? (e.g.
> Jon's head. Obviously Jon can release himself, but some other cliparts can't
> be "proved" in this way.
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Greg Bulmash <
> oneminuteinspirations at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm actually more concerned at this point whether the photo he
>> vectorized was one he shot and whether he has the proper model
>> releases to put the image into the public domain in this way.
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 7:46 PM, Francis Bond <bond at ieee.org> wrote:
>> > G'day,
>> >
>> > we should perhaps also try to add more NSFW tags, and mention them in
>> > the documentation.  If you click on the "woman" tag, there are quite a
>> > few that I would consider NSFW.  I agree with John that we should keep
>> > them, but I would be much happier if there was a way of not showing
>> > them (and probably have it on by default so that our site is a little
>> > more school friendly).
>> >
>> > Librarians could start off by tagging these as soon as possible.
>> >
>> > On 1 May 2010 10:33, chovynz <chovynz at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I agree with what you said. However in this case, I think it would be
>> >> appropriate to delete.
>> >> NSFW filters simply is not working correctly, and (based on historic
>> >> performance) it could be another month before Whoever it is who can do
>> >> something about it, can get to doing it.
>> >>
>> >> Librarians cannot do anything else. (We can't even delete.) I tried to
>> hide
>> >> it, but since it is still there, there's nothing further we librarians
>> can
>> >> do. It's over to Bassel or Jon (or whoever else has DB access) to do
>> >> something. (Or if there is another solution I'd be glad to hear it.)
>> >>
>> >> And the NSFW issue has been on the bug tracker since before Aiki
>> changeover.
>> >> Admittedly with a different framework, but IMO it would be good to have
>> this
>> >> sorted out ASAP. I don't feel comfortable sharing OCAL with schools
>> until it
>> >> is sorted.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers
>> >> Chovynz
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Jon Phillips <jon at rejon.org> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> No, we shouldn't delete it because it doesn't violate our guidelines,
>> >>> and we have taken a pretty hard stance in the past against this type
>> >>> of activity. With that being said, until we have NSFW filters in
>> >>> place, I think it sounds reasonable to hide files that can't be
>> >>> filtered out.
>> >>>
>> >>> But, we should make sure to file them on the bug tracker under
>> >>> something like Add NSFW/tag filter for site. Users should be able to
>> >>> configure their own filters and by default, we should be very
>> >>> conservative on first visit to the site, IMO, especially on the main
>> >>> page.
>> >>>
>> >>> Thoughts?
>> >>>
>> >>> Jon
>> >>>
>> >>> <snip />
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/clipart/attachments/20100501/afff0f1c/attachment.html>