[Clipart] URGENT: http://www.openclipart.org/detail/48463

Tue May 4 20:22:40 PDT 2010

Looks good.
We can't change anything can we?
Or did you want us to give you text?

The next line is
"Ask to become a librarian!"

by the way I put some librarian stuff in.
http://openclipart.org/wiki/Librarian

On 5/5/10, Jon Phillips <jon at rejon.org> wrote:
> Cool, Chovynz and known librarians, it would be great to make sure
> this is accurate on http://openclipart.org/parcipate
>
> Librarian
>
> How to be a Librarian.
> File at least 1 bug.
> Check at least 1 piece of clipart.
> File at least 1 detailed feature request.
> Participate on the project mailing list, chat channel and community.
>
> ###
>
> What about making a page on the wiki and/or dusting off a page like
> http://openclipart.org/wiki/librarian
>
> To list who is a librarian, and fleshing out these ongoing tasks...we
> can then try to work hard to add features to support these efforts and
> remove the most time intensive/repetitive actions...yes, we all love
> and want more librarians!
>
> Awesome!
>
> Jon
>
>
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Francis Bond <bond at ieee.org> wrote:
>> Also, after I have edited tags, do I need to also submit, or will it
>> automatically save (preferred).
>>
>> On 2 May 2010 11:03:10 UTC+8, bond <bond at ieee.org> wrote:
>>> G'day,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the awesome power and the tips.
>>>
>>> I will also do a bit of checking for nsfw to start off with.
>>>
>>> To tag nsfw, I click on the number, a small menu pops up, and then I
>>> select nsfw and save.
>>>
>>> After that, is there any way to confirm that the change has been made?
>>>
>>> For example, I think I have tagged:
>>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/26406
>>>
>>> can anyone confirm this?
>>>
>>> I know Bassel is already working hard on the nsfw work thing, so forgive
>>> the extra request but (a) having the menu there from the start would make
>>> life quicker and (b) some visible confirmation would be great.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>>
>>> On 2 May 2010 10:55, chovynz <chovynz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hi Francis
>>>>
>>>> Now that you are a librarian, feel free to ask any question if you need
>>>> help.
>>>> Librarians are a bit limited in tools at the moment due to continuing
>>>> development of the background aiki, so just be aware of that.
>>>> Do what you can. Enjoy the process! ;)
>>>>
>>>> Other librarians that I know of are :
>>>> "John Olsen" <johnny_automatic at mac.com>,
>>>> "Joanna Pszenicyn" <papapishu at gmail.com>,
>>>>
>>>> Tom (?) was/is one.
>>>> Darth Gimp possibly is one?
>>>>
>>>> I don't really know who else is. John might know!
>>>>
>>>> Jobs that I'm working through currently are:
>>>> 1) continuing to upload clipart via the Anonymous Account from old OCAL
>>>> databases.
>>>> 2) marking some clipart as NSFW. (As Bassel showed we can do that on the
>>>> individual clipart pages now.) I'm working through the most obvious tag
>>>> of
>>>> "Woman" and just plodding through those. Some cliparts I would not
>>>> classify
>>>> as nsfw (Such as the Virtruvian man), but others are blatantly nsfw. In
>>>> the
>>>> grey areas of these two would be some of Nicubunu's sihlouettes, due to
>>>> poses, so for some of them I'm adding nsfw checkbox, just to be on the
>>>> "safe" side. (Haha. Pun)
>>>> 3) adjusting the clipart tag lists from those with no spaces to a
>>>> commaSPACE. (Also removing tags such as "media, svg, image,
>>>> public_domain,"
>>>> etcetc.
>>>> 4) Now that the wiki has been updated to the latest version of Mediawiki
>>>> I'm
>>>> looking at re-doing some of the wiki to reflect the current
>>>> manifestation of
>>>> OCAL. This includes adding javascript support and other things to the
>>>> wiki
>>>> for Hide/show tables. Any ideas on how to make the wiki a better place,
>>>> (easier to navigate/more understandable/easier to read and find related
>>>> info) is welcome.
>>>>
>>>> Gratz on having the courage to ask to be a Librarian! May your Broom be
>>>> ever
>>>> dusty! May your plunger be ever full.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Chovynz
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Francis Bond <bond at ieee.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> G'day,
>>>>>
>>>>> we should perhaps also try to add more NSFW tags, and mention them in
>>>>> the documentation.  If you click on the "woman" tag, there are quite a
>>>>> few that I would consider NSFW.  I agree with John that we should keep
>>>>> them, but I would be much happier if there was a way of not showing
>>>>> them (and probably have it on by default so that our site is a little
>>>>> more school friendly).
>>>>>
>>>>> Librarians could start off by tagging these as soon as possible.
>>>>>
>>>>> On 1 May 2010 10:33, chovynz <chovynz at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> > I agree with what you said. However in this case, I think it would be
>>>>> > appropriate to delete.
>>>>> > NSFW filters simply is not working correctly, and (based on historic
>>>>> > performance) it could be another month before Whoever it is who can
>>>>> > do
>>>>> > something about it, can get to doing it.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Librarians cannot do anything else. (We can't even delete.) I tried
>>>>> > to
>>>>> > hide
>>>>> > it, but since it is still there, there's nothing further we
>>>>> > librarians
>>>>> > can
>>>>> > do. It's over to Bassel or Jon (or whoever else has DB access) to do
>>>>> > something. (Or if there is another solution I'd be glad to hear it.)
>>>>> >
>>>>> > And the NSFW issue has been on the bug tracker since before Aiki
>>>>> > changeover.
>>>>> > Admittedly with a different framework, but IMO it would be good to
>>>>> > have
>>>>> > this
>>>>> > sorted out ASAP. I don't feel comfortable sharing OCAL with schools
>>>>> > until it
>>>>> > is sorted.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Cheers
>>>>> > Chovynz
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Jon Phillips <jon at rejon.org> wrote:
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> No, we shouldn't delete it because it doesn't violate our
>>>>> >> guidelines,
>>>>> >> and we have taken a pretty hard stance in the past against this type
>>>>> >> of activity. With that being said, until we have NSFW filters in
>>>>> >> place, I think it sounds reasonable to hide files that can't be
>>>>> >> filtered out.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> But, we should make sure to file them on the bug tracker under
>>>>> >> something like Add NSFW/tag filter for site. Users should be able to
>>>>> >> configure their own filters and by default, we should be very
>>>>> >> conservative on first visit to the site, IMO, especially on the main
>>>>> >> page.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Thoughts?
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Jon
>>>>> >>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/>
>>> Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies
>>> Nanyang Technological University
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Francis Bond <http://www3.ntu.edu.sg/home/fcbond/>
>> Division of Linguistics and Multilingual Studies
>> Nanyang Technological University
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jon Phillips
> http://rejon.org/
> http://fabricatorz.com/
> http://status.net/
> http://rejon.status.net + skype: kidproto
> +1.415.830.3884 (sf/global)
> +86.134.3957.2035 (china)
>

-- 
Cheers
Chovynz