afl 2.1 license
michael at ximian.com
Tue Nov 30 20:41:47 PST 2004
On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 10:49 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 14:04 +0530, Michael Meeks wrote:
> > I guess it is better - but I guess we would have to do some painful
> > legal work in-house to review the terms. At least the immediately
> > obvious, no-brainer "this will never fly whatsoever", poison pill
> > appears to have gone (to my untrained eye). Of course, what a
> > combination is I have no idea.
> It has specific legal meaning I believe. I don't think your lawyers will
> choke on AFL - sort of the whole point of AFL is that it's a lawyer-
> friendly X/BSD type of license.
Fair enough :-)
michael.meeks at novell.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
More information about the dbus