D-Bus User Bus

[Scott James Remnant]

On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 20:56 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:

> I am against this. While I probably want to come to the same goal as you
> do, I am suggesting going things differently -- and without a seperate
> user bus.
> 
> I used to be a proponent of a user bus, and in fact I still have a
> checkout lying around here which implements most of the logic of a user
> bus. However I have since changed my position on this and am now more
> siding with Colin who wants to redefine the current session bus a little
> so that it becomes a more of a user bus. A seperate per-session bus is
> unnecessary if we have a per-user bus; instead of seperating services of
> session via the notion of multiple busses, we should seperate them via a
> display id of some kind in the bus names (if necessary at all). 
> 
If the current session bus gets repurposed as a user bus, that works for
me too.

Scott
-- 
Scott James Remnant
scott at ubuntu.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dbus/attachments/20100516/39048cfe/attachment.pgp>