[Mesa-dev] [PATCH 09/12] glsl: Convert lower_clip_distance_visitor to be an ir_rvalue_visitor

Kenneth Graunke kenneth at whitecape.org
Tue May 7 00:52:07 PDT 2013


On 05/03/2013 04:07 PM, Ian Romanick wrote:
> From: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
>
> Right now the lower_clip_distance_visitor lowers variable indexing into
> gl_ClipDistance into variable indexing into both the array
> gl_ClipDistanceMESA and the vectors of that array.  For example,
>
>      gl_ClipDistance[i] = f;
>
> becomes
>
>      gl_ClipDistanceMESA[i/4][i%4] = f;
>
> However, variable indexing into vectors using ir_dereference_array is
> being removed.  Instead, ir_expression with ir_triop_vector_insert will
> be used.  The above code will become
>
>      gl_ClipDistanceMESA[i/4] = vector_insert(gl_ClipDistanceMESA[i/4],
>                                               i % 4,
>                                               f);
>
> In order to do this, an ir_rvalue_visitor will need to be used.  This
> commit is really just a refactor to get ready for that.
>
> v2: Convert tabs to spaces.  Suggested by Eric.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick <ian.d.romanick at intel.com>
> Cc: Paul Berry <stereotype441 at gmail.com>
> ---
>   src/glsl/lower_clip_distance.cpp | 136 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 50 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/glsl/lower_clip_distance.cpp b/src/glsl/lower_clip_distance.cpp
> index 643807d..19068fb 100644
> --- a/src/glsl/lower_clip_distance.cpp
> +++ b/src/glsl/lower_clip_distance.cpp
> @@ -46,10 +46,10 @@
>    */
>
>   #include "glsl_symbol_table.h"
> -#include "ir_hierarchical_visitor.h"
> +#include "ir_rvalue_visitor.h"
>   #include "ir.h"
>
> -class lower_clip_distance_visitor : public ir_hierarchical_visitor {
> +class lower_clip_distance_visitor : public ir_rvalue_visitor {
>   public:
>      lower_clip_distance_visitor()
>         : progress(false), old_clip_distance_var(NULL),
> @@ -59,11 +59,12 @@ public:
>
>      virtual ir_visitor_status visit(ir_variable *);
>      void create_indices(ir_rvalue*, ir_rvalue *&, ir_rvalue *&);
> -   virtual ir_visitor_status visit_leave(ir_dereference_array *);
>      virtual ir_visitor_status visit_leave(ir_assignment *);
>      void visit_new_assignment(ir_assignment *ir);
>      virtual ir_visitor_status visit_leave(ir_call *);
>
> +   virtual void handle_rvalue(ir_rvalue **rvalue);
> +
>      bool progress;
>
>      /**
> @@ -173,33 +174,35 @@ lower_clip_distance_visitor::create_indices(ir_rvalue *old_index,
>   }
>
>
> -/**
> - * Replace any expression that indexes into the gl_ClipDistance array with an
> - * expression that indexes into one of the vec4's in gl_ClipDistanceMESA and
> - * accesses the appropriate component.
> - */
> -ir_visitor_status
> -lower_clip_distance_visitor::visit_leave(ir_dereference_array *ir)
> +void
> +lower_clip_distance_visitor::handle_rvalue(ir_rvalue **rv)
>   {
>      /* If the gl_ClipDistance var hasn't been declared yet, then
>       * there's no way this deref can refer to it.
>       */
> -   if (!this->old_clip_distance_var)
> -      return visit_continue;
> -
> -   ir_dereference_variable *old_var_ref = ir->array->as_dereference_variable();
> -   if (old_var_ref && old_var_ref->var == this->old_clip_distance_var) {
> -      this->progress = true;
> -      ir_rvalue *array_index;
> -      ir_rvalue *swizzle_index;
> -      this->create_indices(ir->array_index, array_index, swizzle_index);
> -      void *mem_ctx = ralloc_parent(ir);
> -      ir->array = new(mem_ctx) ir_dereference_array(
> -         this->new_clip_distance_var, array_index);
> -      ir->array_index = swizzle_index;
> +   if (!this->old_clip_distance_var || *rv == NULL)
> +      return;
> +
> +   ir_dereference_array *const array = (*rv)->as_dereference_array();
> +   if (array != NULL) {

Writing this as:

    if (array == NULL)
       return;

would have allowed the indentation to stay the same and probably made 
the patch easier to follow.  But at this point I'm not sure it matters.

> +      /* Replace any expression that indexes into the gl_ClipDistance array
> +       * with an expression that indexes into one of the vec4's in
> +       * gl_ClipDistanceMESA and accesses the appropriate component.
> +       */
> +      ir_dereference_variable *old_var_ref =
> +         array->array->as_dereference_variable();
> +      if (old_var_ref && old_var_ref->var == this->old_clip_distance_var) {
> +         this->progress = true;
> +         ir_rvalue *array_index;
> +         ir_rvalue *swizzle_index;
> +         this->create_indices(array->array_index, array_index, swizzle_index);
> +         void *mem_ctx = ralloc_parent(array);
> +         array->array =
> +            new(mem_ctx) ir_dereference_array(this->new_clip_distance_var,
> +                                              array_index);
> +         array->array_index = swizzle_index;
> +      }
>      }
> -
> -   return visit_continue;
>   }
>
>
> @@ -214,38 +217,71 @@ lower_clip_distance_visitor::visit_leave(ir_assignment *ir)
>   {
>      ir_dereference_variable *lhs_var = ir->lhs->as_dereference_variable();
>      ir_dereference_variable *rhs_var = ir->rhs->as_dereference_variable();
> -   if ((lhs_var && lhs_var->var == this->old_clip_distance_var)
> -       || (rhs_var && rhs_var->var == this->old_clip_distance_var)) {

Splitting this into LHS/RHS cases is fine, but it's unrelated to 
converting this visitor to an rvalue visitor.  I'd also prefer it to be 
done in a separate patch.

> -      /* LHS or RHS of the assignment is the entire gl_ClipDistance array.
> -       * Since we are reshaping gl_ClipDistance from an array of floats to an
> -       * array of vec4's, this isn't going to work as a bulk assignment
> -       * anymore, so unroll it to element-by-element assignments and lower
> -       * each of them.
> -       *
> -       * Note: to unroll into element-by-element assignments, we need to make
> -       * clones of the LHS and RHS.  This is only safe if the LHS and RHS are
> -       * side-effect free.  Fortunately, we know that they are, because the
> -       * only kind of rvalue that can have side effects is an ir_call, and
> -       * ir_calls only appear (a) as a statement on their own, or (b) as the
> -       * RHS of an assignment that stores the result of the call in a
> -       * temporary variable.
> -       */
> -      void *ctx = ralloc_parent(ir);
> +   void *ctx = ralloc_parent(ir);
> +
> +   /* LHS or RHS of the assignment is the entire gl_ClipDistance array.
> +    * Since we are reshaping gl_ClipDistance from an array of floats to an
> +    * array of vec4's, this isn't going to work as a bulk assignment
> +    * anymore, so unroll it to element-by-element assignments and lower
> +    * each of them.
> +    *
> +    * Note: to unroll into element-by-element assignments, we need to make
> +    * clones of the LHS and RHS.  This is only safe if the LHS and RHS are
> +    * side-effect free.  Fortunately, we know that they are, because the
> +    * only kind of rvalue that can have side effects is an ir_call, and
> +    * ir_calls only appear (a) as a statement on their own, or (b) as the
> +    * RHS of an assignment that stores the result of the call in a
> +    * temporary variable.
> +    */
> +   if (lhs_var && lhs_var->var == this->old_clip_distance_var) {
>         int array_size = this->old_clip_distance_var->type->array_size();
>         for (int i = 0; i < array_size; ++i) {
> -         ir_dereference_array *new_lhs = new(ctx) ir_dereference_array(
> -            ir->lhs->clone(ctx, NULL), new(ctx) ir_constant(i));
> -         new_lhs->accept(this);
> +         ir_dereference_variable *const new_deref =
> +            new(ctx) ir_dereference_variable(new_clip_distance_var);
> +
> +         ir_dereference_array *const new_lhs =
> +            new(ctx) ir_dereference_array(new_deref,
> +                                          new(ctx) ir_constant(i / 4));
> +
>            ir_dereference_array *new_rhs = new(ctx) ir_dereference_array(
>               ir->rhs->clone(ctx, NULL), new(ctx) ir_constant(i));
> -         new_rhs->accept(this);
> -         this->base_ir->insert_before(
> -            new(ctx) ir_assignment(new_lhs, new_rhs));
> +
> +         const int mask = 1 << (i % 4);
> +
> +         ir_assignment *const assign =
> +            new(ctx) ir_assignment(new_lhs, new_rhs, NULL, mask);
> +
> +         this->base_ir->insert_before(assign);
>         }
>         ir->remove();
> +
> +      return visit_continue;
> +   } else if (rhs_var && rhs_var->var == this->old_clip_distance_var) {
> +      int array_size = this->old_clip_distance_var->type->array_size();
> +      for (int i = 0; i < array_size; ++i) {
> +         ir_dereference_array *new_lhs = new(ctx) ir_dereference_array(
> +            ir->lhs->clone(ctx, NULL), new(ctx) ir_constant(i));
> +
> +         ir_dereference_variable *const new_deref =
> +            new(ctx) ir_dereference_variable(new_clip_distance_var);
> +
> +         ir_rvalue *const new_rhs =
> +            new(ctx) ir_swizzle(new(ctx) ir_dereference_array(new_deref,
> +                                                              new(ctx) ir_constant(i / 4)),
> +                                i % 4, 0, 0, 0, 1);

This is a third change: making the RHS case do something different than 
the LHS case.  It looks fine as well, it just shouldn't be in the rvalue 
refactor.

> +         ir_assignment *const assign =
> +            new(ctx) ir_assignment(new_lhs, new_rhs);
> +
> +         this->base_ir->insert_before(assign);
> +      }
> +      ir->remove();
> +
> +      return visit_continue;
>      }
>
> -   return visit_continue;
> +   handle_rvalue((ir_rvalue **)&ir->lhs);
> +   return rvalue_visit(ir);
>   }
>
>
> @@ -330,7 +366,7 @@ lower_clip_distance_visitor::visit_leave(ir_call *ir)
>         }
>      }
>
> -   return visit_continue;
> +   return rvalue_visit(ir);
>   }



More information about the mesa-dev mailing list