[Mesa-dev] libdrm versioning - switch to 19.0.0?
Dave Airlie
airlied at gmail.com
Fri Oct 11 06:01:55 UTC 2019
On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 14:56, Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 7:46 PM Jason Ekstrand <jason at jlekstrand.net> wrote:
> >
> > On October 10, 2019 15:15:29 Marek Olšák <maraeo at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I expect to make a new libdrm release soon. Any objections to changing the versioning scheme?
> >>
> >> Current: 2.4.n
> >> n = starts from 0, incremented per release
> >>
> >> New proposals:
> >> year.n.0 (19.0.0)
> >
> >
> >
> > Following the Mesa convention seems reasonable.
> >
>
> can't we get to 2.4.999?
>
> j/k, I also agree that following mesa convention seems reasonable
>
> BR,
> -R
Are we talking package version and library version or just package?
Changing the library version major would be a larger undertaking, we
probably should have been changing the minor for ages.
Dave.
More information about the mesa-dev
mailing list