u_int32_t vs uint32_t

[Keith Packard]

Around 16 o'clock on Aug 23, Alan Coopersmith wrote:

> So what about just using CARD32 as the rest of the X code does to define
> this portably?

That sounds like where we are at this point with the limited abilities of 
imake to accomodate system variance.

I wonder what the US version of this code did; it seems like it built and 
ran nicely on all of the standard platforms...

-keith


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://freedesktop.org/pipermail/release-wranglers/attachments/20040823/7ef952e1/attachment.pgp