CVS access policy, branching/tagging, code review, etc.

[Keith Packard]

--==_Exmh_-1562120608P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Around 15 o'clock on Mar 2, "Kaleb S. KEITHLEY" wrote:

> Maybe in some organizations. The way this tree was originally set up it 
> is intended that HEAD be the release vehicle.

I'd really rather see "normal" development done on HEAD with releases done 
on branches; the expectation is that the release branch will provide a 
place for back-porting of security fixes with future minor releases.  How 
is that done in the CURRENT-STABLE-HEAD world?

-keith



--==_Exmh_-1562120608P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.3.1 11/28/2001

iD8DBQFARO/QQp8BWwlsTdMRAvWtAKDVbKSlxiieYHrHMCtcZ1sipp/4VQCg1OFb
f4g/R403AVl4FDWGj27CmXc=
=eJcw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_-1562120608P--