[Uim] Result of whether should we have a stable branch or not
TOKUNAGA Hiroyuki
tkng at xem.jp
Fri May 14 11:16:37 EEST 2004
Sorry for absence, I had to write a paper to submit GUADEC in recent
days. (Yes, I'll go to Norway in June!)
Summary of opinions:
David: Good idea.
Yamaken: I couldn't imagine that stable branch is effectively working.
Jon: We shouldn't do until UIM offers a minimally practical input for CJK.
Ken: We shouldn't do until UIM have stable API/ABI.
Agree:1 Disagree:3
So, I conclude that we shouldn't have a stable branch now.
Instead of creating stable branch, I'll introduce 'stable mark' which
Yamaken suggested if there's no objection.
Regards,
--
TOKUNAGA Hiroyuki
http://kodou.net/
More information about the uim
mailing list