[Uim] Suggestion: im-label-name

[TOKUNAGA Hiroyuki]

On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 09:39:51 +0900
YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:

> At Sat, 29 Jan 2005 08:05:16 +0900,
> tkng at xem.jp wrote:
> (snip)
> > On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 21:25:15 +0900
> > YamaKen <yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp> wrote:
> > > By the way, do you mean that C API
> > > (uim_get_im_explanatory_name()) is also required?
> > 
> > As a conclusion, following list is my candidate. If I implement,
> > I'll use uim_get_im_human_readable_name. But I don't have enough
> > energy to continue this discussion, you should use your best naming.
> > Implementor sould have a right to determine the function name.
> > 
> >  - Best: uim_get_im_human_readable_name
> >  - Second best: uim_get_im_name_for_display
> >  - Third best: uim_get_im_label or uim_get_im_name_label
> 
> Please answer again. Do you want C version of the API?

No. I've forgotten that you don't need C API. Of course I don't need for now.


> I had suggested a Scheme API and I don't need C API. I would not
> like to add the C API to avoid scattering the API with premature
> name.
> 
> I suggest that leaving the Scheme API im-label-name untouched at
> now to close this issue. Otherwise discussion continues.

 How do you like im-name-label? If not, I agree im-label-name.


Regards,

-- 
TOKUNAGA Hiroyuki
tkng at xem.jp
http://kodou.net/