[Uim] reliability fix: uim-fep.c
YAMAMOTO Kengo / YamaKen
yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
Thu Apr 5 17:40:40 EEST 2007
At Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:51:19 +0900,
ek.kato at gmail.com wrote:
>
> Sure, and thanks for the reminder. BTW, what do you think about using
> "long long" with -std=c89?
It's acceptable, I think. Does -Wno-long-long effective?
What we should decline by -std=c89 is:
- GNU extensions (although glibc platforms requires -std=gnu89)
- C++/C99 style variable declarations
- C++/C99 style comments
- And what I forgotten
These restrictions are for keeping portability and
readability. Since the 'long long' issue is very limited and
easy to resolve if a portability problem is caused in some
future, it doesn't matter on libuim.
------------------------------------------------
YAMAMOTO Kengo / YamaKen yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
FAMILY Given / Nick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_name
More information about the uim
mailing list