[Uim] reliability fix: uim-fep.c

YAMAMOTO Kengo / YamaKen yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
Thu Apr 5 17:40:40 EEST 2007


At Thu, 5 Apr 2007 20:51:19 +0900,
ek.kato at gmail.com wrote:
> 
> Sure, and thanks for the reminder.  BTW, what do you think about using
> "long long" with -std=c89?

It's acceptable, I think. Does -Wno-long-long effective?

What we should decline by -std=c89 is:
  - GNU extensions (although glibc platforms requires -std=gnu89)
  - C++/C99 style variable declarations
  - C++/C99 style comments
  - And what I forgotten

These restrictions are for keeping portability and
readability. Since the 'long long' issue is very limited and
easy to resolve if a portability problem is caused in some
future, it doesn't matter on libuim.

------------------------------------------------
YAMAMOTO Kengo / YamaKen  yamaken at bp.iij4u.or.jp
FAMILY   Given / Nick
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_name



More information about the uim mailing list