[Uim] [Docs] UIM-XIM slowness
Etsushi Kato
ek.kato at gmail.com
Fri Jan 5 09:07:14 EET 2007
Hi,
On 12/29/06, Martin Swift <martin at swift.is> wrote:
> I tried uim-xim when I ran into my GTK+ problems. It slowed some
> things down a lot. Starting terminals took a few seconds while
> normally it is instantaneous. Starting a terminal with uim-fep (e.g.
> 'urxvt -e uim-fep', using rxvt-unicode) is much faster, though a
> little slower than without.
>
> Two questions for the docs:
>
> Is the XIM slowness an inherent problem with the bridge?
XIM is a legacy protocol and actually slow in the performance. But
taking a few seconds seems storange. I often uses uim-xim on mlterm
and it starts immediately after the command. I think XIM code in
rxvt-unicode has some perfomance loss.
> Should we officially recommend uim-fep for terminals?
I think there is no official recommendation. IMHO uim-fep is useful
in combination with GNU screen. But it lacks some key handling
ability (like shift-space, see README.key in fep) and doesn't have
X11's compose input. So uim-xim is fine for traditional terminal
applications such as xterm. Another choice is using terminal
application which uses IM module of GTK+ or Qt like gnome-terminal.
Cheers,
--
Etsushi Kato
ek.kato at gmail.com
More information about the uim
mailing list