Diff for review: Was: Menu spec: sorting

[Waldo Bastian]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 31 July 2003 13:00, Waldo Bastian wrote:
> There was a nice thread about menu-sorting and menu-inlining a while ago,
> see https://www.redhat.com/archives/xdg-list/2003-January/msg00157.html
>
> I don't think it resulted in any actual changes to the spec though.

I have prepared a patch for the menu-spec to include all kinds of layout hints 
based on previous discussion.

I'm not sure if I have the terminology right... do tags have "parameters" ? Or 
are those things called different?

The original proposal used "<Order>" elements, I have changed that to 
<Layout>.

The original proposal suggested to use a "showInline" bool in the .directory 
file of the menu, I think it is more practical to define whether to inline or 
not as part of the layout definition.

Heinrich suggested NotShowIfEmpty and ShowIfEmpty and I have added those
in the form of a show_empty parameter for the Layout menu.

My docbook code probably sucks layout wise. If anyone has suggestions for 
improvement I would appreciate that.

Awaiting your feedback.

Cheers,
Waldo
- -- 
bastian at kde.org -=|[ SuSE, The Linux Desktop Experts ]|=- bastian at suse.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE/Y0I5N4pvrENfboIRArKpAJ9vsw1UEg2EYi3CQQNljIEFD2WSHQCfXH1D
MhAK3nYIzdXZTOg8WPN8AvI=
=aI78
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: menu-spec.xml.diff
Type: text/x-diff
Size: 8864 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xdg/attachments/20030913/da01a898/attachment.diff