[Xlibs] libXfont shared library version
Keith Packard
keithp@keithp.com
Sat, 08 Nov 2003 20:18:03 -0800
Around 20 o'clock on Nov 8, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I would lean towards the idea of the libraries initially having the
> shlib version as the package version, and then increasing the package
> version independently from there on out. The desktop release version
> wouldn't be related to the versions of the individual parts.
Ok. That's as sensible as anything, at least to start. Note that the
--version-info libraries will use different numbers on BSD and Linux; I
suggest using the Linux version number for the package version as that's
what most people will see, and is easily translated to a BSD version
number.
-keith