[Xlibs] proposed libXt fixes

Jim Gettys Jim.Gettys@hp.com
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 14:27:31 -0500

Eric, commit at will.  I'm no AM expert, but the patch looks good
to me (though I'm also not quite sure what problem this is solving: it
looks like we were installing into the wrong places?). If you had also
updated the ChangeLog before generating the patch, this intent would
have been more clear.

And I hate automake too; just as much as I hate Imake: I'm an equal
opportunity hater.  But I firmly believe that using autotools is the
right long term transition to make...
                           - Jim

On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 14:04, Eric Anholt wrote:
> http://pdx.freedesktop.org/~anholt/libXt-i-hate-autotools.diff
> Does this look good to people?  With this I can build and install from a
> "make dist," though it doesn't distcheck yet.  Includes disting of
> missing files, installing of a header that XFree86 installs
> (StringDefs.h), ignoring of errors that happen on srcdir == builddir,
> and using X_CFLAGS to build makestrs, which uses an X11 header.
> off to sushi
Jim Gettys <Jim.Gettys@hp.com>
HP Labs, Cambridge Research Laboratory