[Xorg] shared vs static libraries

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, 2004-08-11 at 15:58, Roland Mainz wrote:
> We weren't thinking about shipping the two libs right now, only linking
> the consumers in the X.org tree against it to avoid the pain of
> symlinking the files around and undo that for the next release when the
> API has become stable. I am not ready with testing the new version (and
> found a very bad time to fall sick again) and Tanja isn't ready with the
> manual pages either.

So, in that case, it is not ready, and must be removed from the tree. To
use your own words, 'I am not happy with playing alphatester for such a
combination in a _production_ environment'; please decide whether it is
ready for shipping, in which case it should be a shared library with
soversion 0.0.0, or it is not ready for shipping, in which case you
retract it to your own tree.

:) d
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20040811/176f2383/attachment.pgp>