xc/programs considered harmful

[Daniel Stone]

On Fri, 2004-12-17 at 11:40 -0500, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2004, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > I understand that xeyes/xlogo/xedit/etc are all neat and whatever, but I
> > don't see their place in the monolithic tree, and I think we can set a
> > great precedent by moving the maintainence of these tools to the modular
> > tree, if they are still required, and then that can become the canonical
> > upstream source.
> 
> I don't think your first message was explicite about adding them to the
> module tree, which means they are just moving, not being purged from the
> universe.
> 
> Which modular project would these be moving to?

If people wanted to maintain them, fd.o has an 'xapps' repository.