Problems getting developer access to the xorg cvs
Brian Paul
brian.paul at tungstengraphics.com
Mon Nov 1 11:15:34 PST 2004
When people want CVS-write access to Mesa on freedesktop.org I've been
pointing them to Daniel Stone or Eric Anholt. I don't know if they're
the "gatekeepers" for the X tree too.
-Brian
Deron Johnson wrote:
> In this particular case it wasn't really an issue of verifying that Amir
> is a good person to receive developer access. The issue was that we
> couldn't find any one person who has the responsibility of granting this
> access. We only knew who PREVIOUSLY had the responsibility. Even Stuart
> Kreitman, who is on the Xorg board, was unable to determine this.
>
> Does anybody know who currently has the responsibility for granting
> developer access?
>
> I think it would benefit Xorg to have a specific mailing list, besides
> site-wranglers, which is a moderated list, for people to send to when
> they are requesting developer access. Call it something like
> xorg-developer-request at freedesktop.org. All you need to do is make
> sure that somebody is always assigned to handle requests sent to this
> alias. This would be a very simple solution to implement.
>
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
>
>>I'm not necessarily in favour of people being granted CVS access sight unseen.
>> I don't know what your developer's situation is, but I don't think there
>>should be an expectation that people who haven't participated in development
>>previously, I'm talking about submitting patches, bug reports, etc., should
>>expect CVS access just by asking for it. Nor, obviously, do I think that the
>>XFree86 idea of (I don't know how much) more than 5 years of waiting for this
>>is desireable either.
>>
>>But I do feel that CVS access should be a priviledge granted sometime after a
>>person has individually shown themselves to be a worthwhile & useful
>>developer. It's obviously a lot less contentious to weed people out *before*
>>granting CVS access to being in a position later on where you have to yank it,
>>which is always going to lead to hard feelings.
>>
>>So, in respect to your developer, I don't see any posts to this list from him
>>(though I don't have a full archive, so I could be wrong) - shouldn't some
>>basic participation in the public lists be a prerequisite to CVS access?
>>
>>Also let me note that I'm not in a position to influence the descision one way
>>or another, just expressing my opinions on the matter.
>>
>>Keith
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> xorg mailing list
> xorg at freedesktop.org
> http://freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
>
More information about the xorg
mailing list