Old and new CVS repositories are available via rsync

[Luc Verhaegen]

On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 03:42:13PM -0500, Kevin E Martin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 10:13:36AM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > 
> > I've made the post-breakin version of CVS available for anonymous rsync 
> > along with a relatively old version of CVS.  We need help looking over the 
> > differences in the repositories to make sure there aren't any 'unexpected' 
> > changes.
> 
> I looked at HEAD and each of the tags and branches.  The only ones with
> differences between the two snapshots (besides HEAD) are:
> 
>     lg3d-dev-0-6-1
>     CYGWIN-6_8_1-MERGE
>     XORG-6_8-branch
>     CYGWIN-HEAD-LAST-MERGE
>     CYGWIN-HEAD-MERGE
>     CYGWIN
> 
> While I cannot comment on the correctness of the code, I've visually
> inspected the changes made to each of these branches/tags and have found
> no suspicious code.
> 
> As expected, the majority of changes are on HEAD.  I've visually
> inspected the changes on HEAD with the exception of Xprint and the SiS
> and VIA drivers.  If Roland can confirm Xprint is okay and the SiS and
> VIA driver authors can verify that their driver code is okay, then I
> think the CVS snapshot from Nov 15 will be okay to use.
xfree86/drivers/via on HEAD of freedesktop.org::compromised-cvs/xorg is 
clean. Compared a checkout to what is kept in the xorg branch on 
unichrome.sf.net CVS.

Should all file revisions be checked? What about branches? What about 
xc/lib/XvMC/hw/via/?

Luc Verhaegen.