Xorg CVS HEAD is clean / was: Re: Old and new CVS repositories are available via rsync
Roland Mainz
roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
Mon Nov 22 01:00:43 PST 2004
Roland Mainz wrote:
>
> Kevin E Martin wrote:
> > > I've made the post-breakin version of CVS available for anonymous rsync
> > > along with a relatively old version of CVS. We need help looking over the
> > > differences in the repositories to make sure there aren't any 'unexpected'
> > > changes.
> >
> > I looked at HEAD and each of the tags and branches. The only ones with
> > differences between the two snapshots (besides HEAD) are:
> >
> > lg3d-dev-0-6-1
> > CYGWIN-6_8_1-MERGE
> > XORG-6_8-branch
> > CYGWIN-HEAD-LAST-MERGE
> > CYGWIN-HEAD-MERGE
> > CYGWIN
> >
> > While I cannot comment on the correctness of the code, I've visually
> > inspected the changes made to each of these branches/tags and have found
> > no suspicious code.
> >
> > As expected, the majority of changes are on HEAD. I've visually
> > inspected the changes on HEAD with the exception of Xprint and the SiS
> > and VIA drivers. If Roland can confirm Xprint is okay and the SiS and
> > VIA driver authors can verify that their driver code is okay, then I
> > think the CVS snapshot from Nov 15 will be okay to use.
>
> I've looked at the code and it seems to be OK... but I'd like to make a
> final verification once the Nov15 tree is online again via doing a full
> checkout and do a manually diff against my development tree (which
> should only show the changes for the GIF DDX :)
I did a checkout of the Xorg CVS trunk Nov15 snapshot (which is
available via pserver now) and compared it to my development snapshot -
it seems to be clean.
Is it possible to get the CVS-over-ssh stuff working again that we can
resume normal work on the tree (e.g. developement, commits etc.), please
?
----
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
(o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
\__\/\/__/ MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
/O /==\ O\ TEL +49 641 7950090
(;O/ \/ \O;)
More information about the xorg
mailing list