[Bug 1896] libX11 support for pt_BR

[Alex Deucher]

On Tue, 23 Nov 2004 12:50:25 +0100, Roland Mainz
<roland.mainz at nrubsig.org> wrote:
> Daniel Stone wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Mon, 2004-11-22 at 10:47 -0800, bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org
> > wrote:
> > > Uhm... daniel... are you aware that patches which should go into the X11R6.8.x
> > > branch have to be
> > > 1. Reviewed
> > > 2. Commited to the Xorg CVS trunk
> > > and then, finally
> > > 3. Requested approval for X11R6.8.x
> > > ?
> >
> > Yes.  If you know of a better method other than Bugzilla with which to
> > seek review, please let me know
> 
> Yeah, the "Xprint" product in freedestkop.org's bugzilla has a "review?"
> flag for such purposes. A while ago I've asked around whether there is
> any interest to enable that flag for the "Xorg" bugzilla product, too -
> but there was no consens which method Xorg should use (simple {
> "review?" }, { "first-review?", "second-review?" } or { "review?" and
> "superreview?" } - that are the three most common methods (ignoring the
> "approval-*"-stuff which is more a management thing than a technical
> review)).
> A quick workaround may be to just enable the "review?" flag for the Xorg
> component to get patches reviewed on demand... I can do that with a new
> clicks but I think at least one of the XOrg directors should sign this
> change off...
> 
> > -- I'm seeking to roll all three into
> > one, effectively.
> 
> Oh my g*d... ;-(
> 
> Effectively this causes confusion as there is now zero control over
> which patches have already been put into Xorg trunk and which not -
> which is usually a requirement _before_ people should start asking
> approval for the patches... ;-/
> 
> > Already, this method has uncovered a problem, so it
> > seems it isn't working too badly ...
> 
> Erm, it was just working for _one_ case (of now a few dozend patches)
> because I have to go througth all the patches for which approval is
> being requested... but I am not an expert for all the code and I doubt
> I'll catch everything...
> 

I dare say many (most?) of the patches requested for 6.8.2 have not
yet been applied to the trunk yet.  I can commit many of the ones for
the components I know, but I don't have time to heavily review all the
patches, so if a patch looks good please say so on the bug report.

Alex

> ----
> 
> bye,
> Roland
> 
> P.S.: I don't own the domain "gisburn.org", just the Bidi counterpart
> "nrubsig.org" (so any emails send to roland.mainz at gisburn.org are either
> going to /dev/null or someone who is surprised to get such emails... :)
> 
> --
>   __ .  . __
>  (o.\ \/ /.o) roland.mainz at nrubsig.org
>   \__\/\/__/  MPEG specialist, C&&JAVA&&Sun&&Unix programmer
>   /O /==\ O\  TEL +49 641 7950090
>  (;O/ \/ \O;)
> 
>