[Bug 1896] libX11 support for pt_BR

[Daniel Stone]

On Tue, 2004-11-23 at 16:13 +0100, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Erm... which patches are that (except those from Daniel Stone - which
> seems to miss more or less all requirements needed to obtain approval
> for X1R6.8.x (and yes, I am ANGRY about this misuse of the approval flag
> system)) - could you please make a list ? Until now I thought all
> patches which are approved for X11R6.8.x are commited to "trunk", too
> (this applies AFAIK to all of my patches and most of the patches I can
> think about).

There's now 19 bugs with 30 attachments pending review and commit and
whatever without any flags at all, and I strongly suggest their
inclusion in 6.8.x.

I'm not doing anything with them or filing further bugs because it makes
you angry.  Tell me how to work without making you angry and I'll do
what I can to get them in and included in a way that doesn't kill you.