running ident on modular xorg tree

[Jon Smirl]

Pick whatever rules you want. Now is just a good time to run indent so
that we don't mess up the CVS change logs. The refactoring has already
toasted the change histories so nothing is lost. This opportunity
doesn't happen every day.

On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 13:59:59 -0700 (PDT), Jeremy C. Reed
<reed at reedmedia.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 7 Sep 2004, Jon Smirl wrote:
> 
> > Would it make sense to run indent over the new xorg modular source
> > tree before a lot of people start using it? Then make it a policy that
> > all check-ins are run through indent too? Given that the tree has been
> > so heavily edited there's no real log trail that will be lost. Would
> > it be good to use the same indent rules that the kernel uses? I'm not
> 
> What kernel?  :)
> 
> Like
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/indent.pro
> http://cvsweb.netbsd.org/bsdweb.cgi/src/share/misc/style
> http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=style&apropos=0&sektion=0&manpath=OpenBSD%20Current&arch=i386&format=html
> http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=style&sektion=9&apropos=0&manpath=FreeBSD+5.2.1-RELEASE
> 
> > working in the xorg tree currently, but we're talking about doing this
> > to the drm tree.
> 
> Since the code is getting farther from other implementations, it does make
> sense and seems like it would be a good idea to have a consistent style.
> 
>  Jeremy C. Reed
> 
>                          open source, Unix, *BSD, Linux training
>                          http://www.pugetsoundtechnology.com/
> 
> 



-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl at gmail.com