Proposed change to xorgcfg

[Matthieu Herrb]

Kean Johnston wrote:
> Jay Cotton wrote:
> 
>>A good call.  Have you filed a bug ?
> 
> I hadn't yet. I wanted to understand why it is the way it is
> first :) 

The main reason is that not much time or energy has been invested in 
xf86cfg/xorgcfg since XFree86 has introduced DDC probes and 
autoconfiguration.
Morevover most Linux distros ship their own configuration programs.

-- 
Matthieu Herrb