fglrx/nvidia/other proprietary driver bugzilla policy
Adam Jackson
ajax at nwnk.net
Tue Jan 11 10:10:42 PST 2005
There are quite a few bugzilla entries for bugs related to the various
proprietary drivers. What's the official policy here?
- Close them NOTOURBUG first, ask questions later?
- Make new components for the proprietary drivers?
- File them away under driver/other? (what I've been doing)
I'm primarily interested in hearing opinions from the people whose drivers are
affected by this, ie, people @nvidia.com or @ati.com. I'm more than happy to
set up components for these drivers and assign them a default owner of
someone at the company in question, but I realize this may not jive with your
workflow. I don't want to see these bugs sit untouched forever, but I want
even less to see the bugzilla categories for the open drivers get cluttered
with bugs in unrelated drivers.
- ajax
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20050111/0790620c/attachment.pgp>
More information about the xorg
mailing list