Disable xterm and XRX builds per default / [Fwd: CVS Update: xc (branch: trunk)]

[Ian Romanick]

Keith Whitwell wrote:
> Keith Packard wrote:
>> Around 5 o'clock on Jan 25, Daniel Stone wrote:
>>
>>> AIUI, building DRI from Mesa can basically be done today.
>>
>> Ajax says "almost".  I can't wait.
> 
> Note that this refers to the clientside code, libGL.so, *_dri.so, etc.
> 
> It doesn't refer to any of the serverside stuff, especially not the 
> software indirect renderer which is built into (I think) dri.a and which 
> contains basically the whole mesa source tree.  The right way to remove 
> this last dependency is to get indirect rendering handled (one way or 
> another) by the hardware acclerated clientside code.

Most of libGLcore.{a,so} is code from somewhere in Mesa.  Ideally this 
would be replaced by some sort of software rendering "DRI" module that 
could be loaded into the server.  Some of the work that I'm doing to 
generate GLX protocol code using scripts will help grease the skids for 
this.  libglx.a contains all of the GLX protocol code, and that pulls in 
some Mesa code and will pull in some code from src/glx/x11 (notably 
indirect_size.[ch]).  I'm not (yet) convinced that libglx should come 
from Mesa.

> Ajax has just posted a bug about Mesa's 'make install' behaviour.  Is 
> there anything else people see as gating on this?