X.org tight loop with SIGALRM
Felix Schulte
felix.schulte at gmail.com
Fri Jan 27 04:27:32 PST 2006
On 1/27/06, greg <greg at lincor.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a known bug with X.org and infinite SIGALRM looping?
> I've googled for this and looked through every bug in your bugzilla that
> mentions SIGALRM.
>
> I'm seeing X using full cpu on some units in production.
> If I do a strace of the X process I get this:
>
> --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) @ 0 (0) ---
> sigreturn() = ? (mask now [])
> --- SIGALRM (Alarm clock) @ 0 (0) ---
> sigreturn() = ? (mask now [])
>
> Repeating for ever. It looks like it gets a SIGALRM, handles it
> then instantly gets another one.
>
> This has so far happened with no discernable pattern for us.
> I've also noticed a post on the debian mailing list from december
> with pretty much identical symptoms
> (http://lists.debian.org/debian-x/2005/12/msg00257.html
>
> However he is using a Nvidia card and we are using a the via driver on a
> via mini-itx with
> 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8623 [Apollo
> CLE266] integrated CastleRock graphics (rev 03)
> Although I've no reason to believe it's the graphics driver.
Try whether turning off the "smart scheduler" fixes the problem. If
this works then you hit
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=467 again... :-(
--
_ Felix Schulte
_|_|_ mailto:felix.schulte at gmail.com
(0 0)
ooO--(_)--Ooo
More information about the xorg
mailing list