[Members] Re: disconnect from board to active developers

[Daniel Stone]

Hi Alex,

On Wed, Oct 18, 2006 at 04:12:21PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> I haven't seen the budget numbers so I don't know how realistic this
> would be, but would Xorg ever consider directly funding the
> development of new drivers or significant infrastructual updates?  For
> example xrandr++ or a real FB manager may have happened years ago if
> it had been funded.  I don't want to take away from individual
> contributors, but most of us only work on X in our spare time so it
> often takes a big ouside contribution or a long period to time for
> major needed changes to happen.

Personally, I'd be extremely wary of anything like this.  To avoid the
perception of just giving money to your mates (even if it's completely
above-board, it does set a precedent that could be abused later), it
would need to be:
  - not a full-time stipend,
  - covered by a mound of paperwork, including regular status work,
  - subject to regular overview,
  - something the community unanimously agrees on.

However, there are some very important projects that just don't get the
attention we need; the corporate body of support is quite narrow, as
opposed to the extremely broad attention that projects like GNOME get,
and we don't have enough hackers to have a kernel-like system either.

So getting some of the talented community hackers working on projects
through part-time funding certainly isn't the worst idea ever.  But it
would take quite a lot to win me over at this stage.

If you have a good idea, please submit a convincing proposal to the
board.  It would, however, require strong support from the board, and
basically unanimous support from the active community members, so we
don't fall into the pit of favouritism/nepotism/whatever.

I do sympathise with you, though; it's extremely frustrating to see some
very promising projects drop away because the authors didn't have time,
or because the company has changed priorities, or something similar.
Unfortunately the bounty programs that were run in GNOME, Debian and
Ubuntu (among others) a while back seem to have basically been an abject
failure[0], because being able to pay small amounts of money (generally
less than €500) to see important work done is a great idea.

Cheers,
Daniel

[0]: Because I think it's fundamentally the wrong model.  Most people
     aren't drive-by hackers: either they will write on it anyway, or
     need money to live on so they can give up their part-time job
     that's getting them through uni, or whatever.  Bounties don't
     provide enough money, but they do unfortunately get a lot of people
     interested who can't follow through.  The failure rate was
     extremely high.

     I was funded by LinuxFund to do the modularisation work between
     January and July 2004.  It wasn't a massive salary, and I certainly
     worked more than the 20 hours a week, but having only that and uni
     to take care of -- no other job -- was invaluable, and it certainly
     wouldn't have been done that quickly if it wasn't for LF's support.

     Unfortunately LinuxFund have now tanked quite badly.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20061019/95a89212/attachment.pgp>