Release criteria for X11 releases

[Daniel Stone]

On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 06:16:37AM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 9/26/07, Daniel Stone <daniel at fooishbar.org> wrote:
> > > 3) XTS run and passed on at least one platform (usually Linux/x86)
> >
> > It'd be nice if we had an XTS that wasn't so antisocial.
> 
> Where is there more information about XTS? I just downloaded it
> xts-5.0.2, and it's a bit difficult to grok. Is there something more
> recent?

http://www.x.org/wiki/TestGroup has some more information, but yes, this
is why I call XTS antisocial.

Cheers,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg/attachments/20070926/f157e3c4/attachment.pgp>