[CREATE] Re: raw processing

[Kai-Uwe Behrmann]

What about using Krita and similiar advanced editors as an external editor 
for images on ocassion?

Scribus, for instance, makes it very easy to tell, which app to use for 
editing loaded images. Thus Scribus focus on its strength and provides 
additional features.

Would this be a way for digicam? Hey, to make applications interact each 
with the other seamless, is the goal of this list.

regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
                                + development for color management 
                                + imaging / panoramas
                                + email: ku.b at gmx.de
                                + http://www.behrmann.name


Am 22.03.06, 08:02 +0100 schrieb Boudewijn Rempt:

> On Thursday 16 March 2006 22:03, Gilles Caulier wrote:
> 
> > sure (:=)))... But Krita developpers are ready to do it ?
> 
> Sure. But it depends on what needs to be done. I like raw support for my 
> users: for myself it's useless since I don't own a camera that supports Raw. 
> And Krita is a pretty big application these days, so my time is limited.  But 
> any concrete "shall we decide on using this common bit of functionality" or 
> "can you help with this" will be favourably considered. Especially if the 
> common bit of functionality is shared through a library instead of code 
> copying.
> 
> I would also like to discuss ways of integrating Digikam and Krita better, so 
> it becomes easier to create a nice workflow, or reuse plugins. Unfortunately, 
> Digikam decided to build their own 16 bit image library, which means that the 
> latter is unlikely to be possible.
> 
> -- 
> Boudewijn Rempt 
> http://www.valdyas.org/fading/index.cgi
>