hp at redhat.com
Fri Aug 17 13:53:54 PDT 2007
On 8/17/07, Havoc Pennington <hp at redhat.com> wrote:
> I would suggest guaranteeing in the API docs that these two callbacks
> are always called alternating (you never get two "owned" in a row or two
> "not owned" in a row). However, if you guarantee that owned_callback is
> always called first, I think there's nothing good to do if the name is
> never owned once.
i.e. since there's nothing good to do, it's better to document that
either one can be called first, if that wasn't clear.
More information about the dbus