[PATCH v2 0/4] drm/exynos, intel: fix locking for flip/vbl event list

[Inki Dae]

2012/11/7 Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>

> On Wed, 2012-11-07 at 18:31 +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> > 2012/11/2 Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> >         The patchset adds the missing event_lock when accessing the
> >         vblank_event_list in drm_vblank_off() and as preparation for
> >         this
> >         also fixes a few other issues in the exynos driver.
> >         This is also a dependency for Rob Clark's
> >         drm_send_vblank_event()
> >         rework as that would trigger a warning for the unhold
> >         event_lock without
> >         this changeset.
> >         The exynos changes are only compile tested, the rest is tested
> >         on an
> >         Intel IVB machine on top of drm-intel-nightly +
> >         drm_send_vblank_event()
> >         rework, with i-g-t/flip_test.
> > Hi Imre,
> > Works fine. But we should wait for Rob's patch set to be merged to
> > -next, and this may be rebased on top of latest Rob's patch set again.
>
> Ok, thanks for checking this. I assume then that this patchset will get
> merged through your tree.
>
> I think Rob's patchset depends on this, so ideally this should go first.
> Otherwise the i915 driver would trigger the WARN in his patchset due to
> the unheld event_lock.
>

Ok, but I merge it first, shouldn't Rob's patch set be rebased? Anyway this
is minor issue so I could resolve it. And it seems like that your patch set
has no dependency of Rob's. I mean that your patch set worked
fine without Rob's.

Thanks,
Inki Dae


>
> --Imre
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20121108/81493588/attachment-0001.html>