State of EGL
brian.paul at tungstengraphics.com
Tue Oct 18 07:45:49 PDT 2005
Juergen Obernolte wrote:
> Dave Airlie <airlied at ...> writes:
>>At this stage you've really only two choices, either use miniglx or
>>dri-egl, the only cards that I know work are radeon (r100/r200), and
>>I'm working on r300 for dri-egl slowly...
>>miniglx is a dead-end path, I support it on hardware for a client, but
>>I'd seriously doubt it'll ever gain any new features..
>>dri-egl is working for me running Xegl on radeon 9200 the last time I
>>tried it, I need to do some testing again on my 9200 for eglgears,
>>before I go back to getting the r300 going..
> Thanks for your reply.
> So it seems that I have to wait until the development is advanced far enough to
> use dri-egl. Is at least the framebuffer driver working? Or are there some
> glitches with it too (I couldn't make it run)? Maybe I can help with the
> Besides, is there some better documentation about the infrastructure of
> Mesa/dri-egl than the one coming with the source? I've looked at the
> Mesa-Homepage too but there is also no good documentation.
There's still some aspects of the EGL_MESA_screen_surface extensions
that haven't been nailed down. The
Mesa/src/egl/docs/EGL_MESA_screen_surface file is the latest.
More information about the dri-egl